Thursday, October 06, 2005
For torture, but against the arts and humanities: an emerging pattern?
In a bold move presumably based upon deeply held principles, nine U.S. senators voted against imposing limits upon ways of interrogating prisoners detained in Iraq and elsewhere. Here's the list of those who gave their hearty support to torture:
Allard (R-CO)
Bond (R-MO)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Stevens (R-AK)
In a related move, an advisory panel of 100 Republican members of the House of Representatives called for an end to all funding for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). The same group, The Republican Study Committee, has also called for the elimination of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). I could not find the full list of the legislative anti-humanists, but presenting the current proposal were:
Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.)
Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas)
[Suggested reading for both stories: Eugene Ionesco, The Rhinoceros]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Very cool design! Useful information. Go on! consumer reports mp3 player Can asymmetrical breasts be fixed with augmentation striped shirt jacket Prices on water heaters Phentermine banners side effects dangers Big long dick Ativan 2baddiction Turkey gulet cruise temporary relief from toothache Honeymoon vacation to alaska Mercedes ruehl nude subaru impreza 2 Conferencing event phentermine 375 mg tablets
ReplyDelete